Patagonia & sustainability
| 1. Is there a policy for the brand to minimize, reduce or compensate carbon emissions? |
|
Patagonia has taken several policy measures to reduce its carbon emissions, such as building green building and ensuring energy efficiency. | Source |
| 2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual absolute carbon footprint of its 'own operations' (Scope 1 & 2) and has the brand already reduced or compensated 10% of these emissions in the last 5 years? |
|
Although Patagonia shows the carbon emissions of single products in its Footprint Chronicles, Patagonia does not communicate a total carbon footprint on its website. Neither does it report whether it has achieved a reduction in its carbon emissions. | Source |
| 3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its absolute ‘own operations’ carbon emissions by at least 20% within the next 5 years? |
|
In the Footprint Chronicles Methodology Patagonia states it is planning to reduce its CO2 footprint. However, Patagonia does not mention any concrete reduction targets on its website. | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) also have a policy to reduce/compensate carbon emissions generated from the product supply chain that is beyond own operations (Scope 3)? |
|
Patagonia's Footprint Chronicles include information on manufacturing energy consumption for every single product (see p.1). | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 5% of its volume? |
|
Patagonia communciates that many products are made of prefereable materials such as organic cotton or recycled polyester. However, Patagonia does not give a total % of the use of preferred materials. | Source |
| 2. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 10% of its volume? |
|
See remark for environmental policy question 1. | Source |
| 3. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 25% of its volume? |
|
See remark for environmental policy question 1. | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) have an environmental policy related to the ‘wet processes’ within the production cycle, like bleaching and dying of fabrics? |
|
Patagonia's clothing is bluesign* certified, which means that high standards are maintained for suitable chemical use and water policies during production. This certification is applicable to some products of Patagonia´s collection. | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
|
All standards are mentioned in Patagonia's Code of Conduct (see link, pages 2 - 3). | Source |
| 2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary and paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? |
|
1. No, not specifially mentioned; 2. Yes, maximum workweek of 48 hours, overtime (max 12 hours) is voluntary; 3.No, only to adhere paying at least minimum wages which comply with legal requirements is enforced by the CoC (see link, page 3). | Source |
| 3. Does this Code of Conduct include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? |
|
Freedom of association is mentioned, but nothing found about situations in which this right is restricted by law (see page 2). | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers, that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
|
Patagonia communicates the list of its direct suppliers. | Source |
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labor conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labor conditions? |
|
Patagonia is a member of the Fair Labor Association (FLA) and the Fair Factory Clearinghouse. | Source |
| 6. Do independent civil society organizations like NGO's and labor unions have a decisive voice in this collective initiative or in these certification schemes? |
|
FLA is acknowledged as a ‘Multi Stakeholder Initiative’ (MSI). | Source |
| 7. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
|
According to the Fair Labor Organisation Patagonia is in compliance with the FLA code. | Source |
| 8. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
|
See remark for labor conditions question 7. | Source |