 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a policy that excludes smelters of conflict minerals by only sourcing minerals from conflict free areas or by only sourcing minerals from conflict areas when human rights are respected and where contributing to conflict is avoided? |
 |
Sony Ericsson parent company's states that it supports the EICC Program and the OECD Guidelines, but does not state that it is implementing this program (see page 18). |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Does the brand (company) have a Code of Conduct (CoC) for both its own factories and those of its suppliers, which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
 |
All standards are mentioned in Supplier Social Responsibility Code (see 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and 3.3.1). (see link PDF "Supplier Social Responsibility Code") |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Does the brand’s (company’s) CoC include at least 3 of the following workers rights: 1. a formally registered employment relationship 2. a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. a sufficient living wage 4. form and join labor unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, to develop parallel means? |
 |
1. Yes, all employees are entitled to a written employment contract; 2. Yes, maximum working week is defined by ILO Convention 1; 3. No, living wage is not mentioned (see 3.2.2 on link PDF "Supplier Social Responsibility Code"). 4. No, Freedom of association is mentioned, but nothing found about situations in which this right is restricted by law (see 3.2.2). |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
 |
Sony Ericsson does not provide a significant list of direct suppliers on its website. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a multi stakeholder initiative (MSI), wherein independent NGO’s or labor unions are represented, that collectively aims to improve labor conditions and that carries out independent audits? Or does the brand (company) significantly purchase its supplies from factories certified by such MSI’s? |
 |
Sony Ericsson is a member of GeSI and EICC, but civil society organizations do not have a decisive voice in these initiatives (see p. 15). |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
 |
Sony Ericsson acknowledges the importance of auditing. (see link, page 15). However, the results of the audits are not made public. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
 |
See remark for labor conditions question 6. |
SOURCE
|