Samsung scores 4 out of 19 at Rank a Brand: Compare how transparent, green and fair your favorite brands are

Samsung Info

Rank a Brand score:

4 out of 19
Please scroll down the score report.

Brand Owner: Samsung Group
Head Office: Seoul, South Korea
Sector: Electronics & ICT Hardware
Categories: Televisions, TV's, Computers, Notebooks, Audio, Video, (Mobile) Phones, Cameras, Camcorders, Home Appliances
Free Tags: GSM, Laptop, Desktop, PC, Netbook, Refrigerator, Vacuum Cleaner, Washing Machine, Air Conditioner

Widget

EMAIL BRAND

Samsung Logo

Find out how green, fair and transparent your favorite brands are.

Compare Other brands

BRAND NAME Brand_name_botline

PERFORMANCE Brand_name_botline

Last Updated: 28 February 2012
Last Verified: 28 February 2012

Samsung Score Report

Questions about Climate Change/ Carbon Emissions

2 out of 5


1. Does the brand (company) clearly support global mandatory cuts of carbon emissions of at least 50% by 2050 or 30% by industrialized countries by 2020?	Samsung supports global mandatory cuts of Greenhouse Gas emissions of at least 50% by 2050 (see Climate Change Policy and goals).	SOURCE
2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual carbon footprint of its 'own operations' and of the supply / production chain?	Samsung discloses Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions on owned factories (Korea and overseas) and own operations (see page 78).	SOURCE
3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its ‘own operations’ carbon footprint by at least 20% within the next 5 years?	No target of 20% by 2012 was identified in Samsung's 2010 sustainability report.	SOURCE
4. Has the brand (company) already reduced or compensated its 'own operations' carbon footprint by at least 10% in the last 5 years?	Since 2006, Samsung has increased its GHG emissions from 8,068 to 9,910 (1,000 tons of CO2) (see p. 78 of the 2010 Sustainability Report).	SOURCE
5. Do all new products of the brand meet the latest Energy Star requirements (where applicable)?	Samsung in its 2010 report states that it is taking actions to meet strict Energy Star guidelines for its entire product lineup. Thus implying that there are some products that are yet to meet these requirements. However, they have met quite a number of the Energy Star requirements since they were awarded the Partner of the Year award (see p.43).	SOURCE

Questions about Environmental Policy

1 out of 7


1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012?	Samsung mentions that it has eliminated PVC and BFRs from all new mobile phones and MP3 players but it is unclear whether it has indeed eliminated PVC and BFRs from all its new products. Samsung has a phase out plan available on its website which begins on 30 June 2010 but provides no end date.	SOURCE
2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products?	PVC and BFRs have been eliminated from some products but its unclear what portion of their total products this represents.	SOURCE
3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012?	Samsung has committed to removing Beryllium from all products by 2013. While Samsung is progressively eliminating products that contain antimony and phthalates it still continues to use these substances in its manufacturing processes.	SOURCE
4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products?	Beryllium, antimony and phthalates are still used (see remark previous question).	SOURCE
5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling?	Samsung supports Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR).	SOURCE
6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold?	Samsung offers recycling and take back services. Directives such as the EU's WEEE (discussed in the Rank a Brand Manual). Furthermore they provide information for recycling processes in the US, Korea and Japan, however no recycling information is provided for other countries in which Samsung's products are sold.	SOURCE
7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025?	Samsung gives evidence of numerous recycling initiatives it undertakes(see pp.48-49). However, it's unclear whether it sources at least 5% of its plastics requirement from recycled sources. Samsung plans to increase its recycling and reuse initiatives but it is unclear how this reflects on its sourcing from recycled plastic streams.	SOURCE

Questions about Labour Conditions/ Fair Trade

1 out of 7


1. Does the brand (company) have a policy that excludes smelters of conflict minerals by only sourcing minerals from conflict free areas or by only sourcing minerals from conflict areas when human rights are respected and where contributing to conflict is avoided?	Samsung states to give priority to conflict free sourcing of the main "conflict minerals". Therefore Samsung states that it is in process to ask all its suppliers to complete the EICC/GeS reporting template to verify conflict-free sourcing.	SOURCE
2. Does the brand (company) have a Code of Conduct (CoC) for both its own factories and those of its suppliers, which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace?	Samsung is a member of the EICC and has adopted the EICC Code of Conduct (CoC). For EICC CoC, see link questions 2&3 below. In the EICC CoC all standards are mentioned (see page 2-4).	SOURCE
3. Does the brand’s (company’s) CoC include at least 3 of the following workers rights: 1. a formally registered employment relationship 2. a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. a sufficient living wage 4. form and join labor unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, to develop parallel means?	1. Not mentioned; 2. No, the CoC states a maximum of 60 hours per week but does not specify how many are overtime; 3. No, wages must comply with applicable wage laws but does not mention a living wage; 4. No, this right is mentioned but a parallel means in situations where these rights are restricted under law is not mentioned. relevant internati	SOURCE
4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume?	Samsung does not provide a significant list of direct suppliers on its website.	SOURCE
5. Is the brand (company) a member of a multi stakeholder initiative (MSI), wherein independent NGO’s or labor unions are represented, that collectively aims to improve labor conditions and that carries out independent audits? Or does the brand (company) significantly purchase its supplies from factories certified by such MSI’s?	Samsung is a member of EICC, but civil society organizations do not have a decisive voice in this initiative.	SOURCE
6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy?	Samsung does not publicly report outcomes or results of its policies to improve labour conditions at its suppliers. In it's 2011 CSR report Samsung only states "there were no violations of laws and regulations related to child labor and forced labor" (page 28-32).	SOURCE
7. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%?	See remark for labor conditions question 6.	SOURCE