 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
Samsung mentions that it has eliminated PVC and BFRs from all new mobile phones and MP3 players but it is unclear whether it has indeed eliminated PVC and BFRs from all its new products. Samsung has a phase out plan available on its website which begins on 30 June 2010 but provides no end date. |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? |
 |
PVC and BFRs have been eliminated from some products but its unclear what portion of their total products this represents. |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
Samsung has committed to removing Beryllium from all products by 2013. While Samsung is progressively eliminating products that contain antimony and phthalates it still continues to use these substances in its manufacturing processes. |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products? |
 |
Beryllium, antimony and phthalates are still used (see remark previous question). |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling? |
 |
Samsung supports Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR). |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold? |
 |
Samsung offers recycling and take back services. Directives such as the EU's WEEE (discussed in the Rank a Brand Manual). Furthermore they provide information for recycling processes in the US, Korea and Japan, however no recycling information is provided for other countries in which Samsung's products are sold. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025? |
 |
Samsung gives evidence of numerous recycling initiatives it undertakes(see pp.48-49). However, it's unclear whether it sources at least 5% of its plastics requirement from recycled sources. Samsung plans to increase its recycling and reuse initiatives but it is unclear how this reflects on its sourcing from recycled plastic streams. |
SOURCE
|