 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a policy that excludes smelters of conflict minerals by only sourcing minerals from conflict free areas or by only sourcing minerals from conflict areas when human rights are respected and where contributing to conflict is avoided? |
 |
Nokia has a policy against illegal trade of natural resources in which Nokia states to prohibit human rights abuses associated with the extraction, transport or trade of minerals and to prohibit any direct or indirect support to non-state armed groups or security forces and requires the same from suppliers (click Policy). |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Does the brand (company) have a Code of Conduct (CoC) for both its own factories and those of its suppliers, which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
 |
All standards are mentioned in “Nokia's Human Rights Approach” (see page 5). |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Does the brand’s (company’s) CoC include at least 3 of the following workers rights: 1. a formally registered employment relationship 2. a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. a sufficient living wage 4. form and join labor unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, to develop parallel means? |
 |
1. Not mentioned; 2. No, supplier must comply with applicable laws and regulations regarding work hours, but maximum workweek and hours of overtime is not specified; 3. No, mentioning of legal and industry minimum wage, not living wage; 4. Freedom of association is mentioned, but nothing found about situations in which this right is restricted by law (p.5) |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
 |
Nokia does not communicate a list of factories on its website. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a multi stakeholder initiative (MSI), wherein independent NGO’s or labor unions are represented, that collectively aims to improve labor conditions and that carries out independent audits? Or does the brand (company) significantly purchase its supplies from factories certified by such MSI’s? |
 |
Nokia is a member of the GeSI, but civil society organizations do not have a decisive voice in this initiative (click on “Human rights and supply chain”). |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
 |
Nokia states that 31 supplier system assessments were conducted (see page 92) and the independent PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy. confirms these data (see page 102 and 103). However, no information is found on the amount of total suppliers or a percentage of suppliers audited or on the audits (see table on page 140). |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
 |
See remark for labor conditions question 6. |
SOURCE
|