 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labour, no child labour, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
 |
Icerbreaker has not published a supplier Code of Conduct on its website. The website mentions that workers must be aged at least 17, and that the work environment must be healthy. However, there is no mentioning of standards against forced labor or discrimination. |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? |
 |
1. Not mentioned; 2. No, maximum workweek is 48 hours plus 12 hours overtime, overtime may be mandatory; 3. No, mentioning of minimum wage, not living wage. |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Does this Code of Conduct include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? |
 |
Icebreaker does not communicate any detailed information on free association rights for workers within their Code of Conduct, if there is one, on its website. Sustainability information should be easily accessible for consumers to make responsible choices. |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers, that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
 |
Icebreaker does not provide a significant published list of direct suppliers on its website. However, there is a track and trace system (which did not work at the day of checking, 21-1-2012). So it is not clear in what factories the products are made. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labour conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labour conditions? |
 |
Icebreaker does not communicate any information on being part of a collective initiative for improving labour rights or their purchases from labour-related accredited suppliers on its website. |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Do independent civil society organizations like NGO's and labour unions have a decisive voice in this collective initiative or in these certification schemes? |
 |
See remark for labor conditions question 5. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labour conditions policy? |
 |
Icebreaker does not provide an annual report on the results of its labour conditions policy on its website. Goals are stated on website, but no results. |
SOURCE
|
| 8. Has the brand's labour conditions policy resulted in a 'compliance level' of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a 'monitored level' of at least 80%? |
 |
Icebreaker does not communicate any information on compliance and monitoring levels of labour conditions on its website. |
SOURCE
|