 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a policy that excludes smelters of conflict minerals by only sourcing minerals from conflict free areas or by only sourcing minerals from conflict areas when human rights are respected and where contributing to conflict is avoided? |
 |
IBM states that it "expects our suppliers and, in turn, their suppliers to adhere to the EICC code of conduct and only source minerals from responsible sources" and "seeks to participate in industry initiatives to create and deploy supply chain verification processes". However, IBM does not state that it excludes suppliers from conflict minerals. |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Does the brand (company) have a Code of Conduct (CoC) for both its own factories and those of its suppliers, which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
 |
All standards are mentioned in IBM Code of Conduct (see pages
4, 5, 8 & 11). |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Does the brand’s (company’s) CoC include at least 3 of the following workers rights: 1. a formally registered employment relationship 2. a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. a sufficient living wage 4. form and join labor unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, to develop parallel means? |
 |
1. Not mentioned; 2. No, maximum working week is 60 hours (including overtime), 'except under extraordinary business circumstances', which can mean anything; 3. No, mentioning of minimum and legal wage, not living wage (see p. 6&7); 4. Freedom of association is mentioned, but nothing found about situations in which this right is restricted by law (see p. 10). |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
 |
IBM does not publish its list of suppliers on its website. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a multi stakeholder initiative (MSI), wherein independent NGO’s or labor unions are represented, that collectively aims to improve labor conditions and that carries out independent audits? Or does the brand (company) significantly purchase its supplies from factories certified by such MSI’s? |
 |
IBM is a member of the EICC, but civil society organizations have no decisive voice in this initiative. |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
 |
IBM provides a brief overview of its audits from 2004-2010, but does not specify these audits in terms of grievance procedures and remediation efforts and strategies (see p.11). |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
 |
See remark for labor conditions question 6. |
SOURCE
|