 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
In 2008, Fujifilm reported that they would reduce or discontinue the usage of PVC and BFRs, but there is no information on this topic in the recent reports. (see page 87) |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? |
 |
See remark for environmental policy question 1. |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
Fuji only gives some remarks about the RoHS and REACH (directives on chemical use). The 3 groups of chemicals are not mentioned in the report (see page 63). |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products? |
 |
See remark for environmental policy question 3. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling? |
 |
Only some reference to WEEE is given, but Fuji does not communicate whether they follow IPR or IPR principles. |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold? |
 |
Fuji does not communicate any information on a take back policy on its website - if there is one. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025? |
 |
Fuji does not communicate a policy on recycled plastics on its website - if there is one. |
SOURCE
|