ASUS scores 2 out of 19 at Rank a Brand: Compare how transparent, green and fair your favorite brands are

ASUS Info

Rank a Brand score:

2 out of 19
Please scroll down the score report.

Brand Owner: ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated
Head Office: Taipei, Taiwan
Sector: Electronics & ICT Hardware
Categories: Televisions, TV's, Computers, Notebooks, Audio, Video
Free Tags: Laptop, Desktop, PC, Netbook, Components, Audio Cards, Flat Screen, Plasma, LCD, HD

Widget

EMAIL BRAND

ASUS Logo

Find out how green, fair and transparent your favorite brands are.

Compare Other brands

BRAND NAME Brand_name_botline

PERFORMANCE Brand_name_botline

Last Updated: 28 February 2012
Last Verified: 28 February 2012

ASUS Score Report

Questions about Climate Change/ Carbon Emissions

0 out of 5


1. Does the brand (company) clearly support global mandatory cuts of carbon emissions of at least 50% by 2050 or 30% by industrialized countries by 2020?	Asus does not state whether or not they support global mandatory emission cuts at these levels.	SOURCE
2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual carbon footprint of its 'own operations' and of the supply / production chain?	ASUS discloses a footprint of greenhouse gas emissions for 2010, but this is only applicable to the Taiwan operations (see p.21 of CSR report 2010).	SOURCE
3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its ‘own operations’ carbon footprint by at least 20% within the next 5 years?	ASUSTek reports to commit to reduce only 15% of the GHG emissions associated with energy use by 2015 (based on 2008 level).	SOURCE
4. Has the brand (company) already reduced or compensated its 'own operations' carbon footprint by at least 10% in the last 5 years?	This is not clear as ASUS publishes carbon emission data since 2008 that doesn't cover the whole company.	SOURCE
5. Do all new products of the brand meet the latest Energy Star requirements (where applicable)?	Two notebook series do comply with the Energy Star requirements (p. 17 of the 2010 CSR report), but the other products are not mentioned.	SOURCE

Questions about Environmental Policy

1 out of 7


1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012?	Asus prohibited the use of PVC in packaging (p.16) and has included BFRs on its Technical Standard (p.15). Asus does not publish this list and it is unclear whether this is a 'restricted' or 'banned' list.	SOURCE
2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products?	See remark environmental policy question 1.	SOURCE
3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012?	In 2010 beryllium and antimony were added to the control list (p.15), but it is not clear whether these chemicals are already eliminated and no timeline is given.	SOURCE
4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products?	See remark environmental policy question 3.	SOURCE
5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling?	Asus explicitly supports the principle of the end of Life producer responsibility.	SOURCE
6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold?	Asus has a recycling programme for North America, Europe, Taiwan, China and India. For North America it is free, for Europe this is unclear.	SOURCE
7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025?	Asus mentions a display which is made from at least 10% post-consumer recycleed plastic, but does not provide any other data (see page 42).	SOURCE

Questions about Labour Conditions/ Fair Trade

1 out of 7


1. Does the brand (company) have a policy that excludes smelters of conflict minerals by only sourcing minerals from conflict free areas or by only sourcing minerals from conflict areas when human rights are respected and where contributing to conflict is avoided?	Asus mentions that it will not accept illegally mined minerals and minerals from mines with inferior working conditions. Although, Asus is only willing to cooperate with the EICC and GeSI, but does not state that it is implementing this program.	SOURCE
2. Does the brand (company) have a Code of Conduct (CoC) for both its own factories and those of its suppliers, which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace?	In ASUS's “Human Rights Declaration” all standards are mentioned.	SOURCE
3. Does the brand’s (company’s) CoC include at least 3 of the following workers rights: 1. a formally registered employment relationship 2. a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. a sufficient living wage 4. form and join labor unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, to develop parallel means?	1. Not mentioned; 2. The maximum working week is as set by local law; 3. Living wage is the legal requirement or higher; 4. Not mentioned.	SOURCE
4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume?	ASUS does not publish a list of its direct suppliers on its website.	SOURCE
5. Is the brand (company) a member of a multi stakeholder initiative (MSI), wherein independent NGO’s or labor unions are represented, that collectively aims to improve labor conditions and that carries out independent audits? Or does the brand (company) significantly purchase its supplies from factories certified by such MSI’s?	ASUS is a member of the EICC, but civil society organizations do not have a decisive voice in this initiative (click on “News and Awards”, then “ASUS has Become a Formal Member of EICC”).	SOURCE
6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy?	ASUS began performing CSR audits in 2011. Some results can be found on the website but the audit is still in progress.	SOURCE
7. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%?	See remark for Labor Conditions question 6.	SOURCE